- Status Closed
- Percent Complete
- Task Type Feature Request
- Category Backend / Core
- Assigned To No-one
- Operating System All
- Severity Low
- Priority Very Low
- Reported Version Devel
- Due in Version 2.36
-
Due Date
Undecided
- Votes
- Private
FS#204 - Unify profile stuff as much as possible.
Currently we have individual tables for cameras, lenses, filters, films, scanners, supports, and flashes.
We need to support multiple flashes, filters, and supports per image.
flashes, filters, supports, and scanners are effectively identical. These could be combined first, and eventually we could allow multiples per image.
Closed by pizza
2008-03-02 17:51
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: camera/film will come later, but otherwise the worst is over.
2008-03-02 17:51
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: camera/film will come later, but otherwise the worst is over.
Loading...
Available keyboard shortcuts
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + l Login Dialog / Logout
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + a Add new task
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + m My searches
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + t focus taskid search
Tasklist
- o open selected task
- j move cursor down
- k move cursor up
Task Details
- n Next task
- p Previous task
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + e ↵ Enter Edit this task
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + w watch task
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + y Close Task
Task Editing
- Alt + ⇧ Shift + s save task
As the i18n effort progresses all of the strings are being unified so that the page code is nearly identical.
The backend stuff is different still, of course.
filters, flashes, supports, and scanners have been unified into a single table.
film, lenses, and cameras will follow.
filters, flashes, supports, scanners, and lenses are merged (r1950)
film and cameras may or may not follow.
film and cameras both have several extra fields that make things more difficult -- iso/filmsize and ICCProfile/IgnoreComment respectively.
I'll leave them out for the time being; we aren't going to have multiple film/cameras for a given image, after all.