Photo Organizer

This is the bug tracker for Photo Organizer.
Tasklist

FS#204 - Unify profile stuff as much as possible.

Attached to Project: Photo Organizer
Opened by Solomon Peachy (pizza) - Friday, 04 May 2007, 10:41 GMT-4
Last edited by Solomon Peachy (pizza) - Sunday, 02 March 2008, 12:51 GMT-4
Task Type Feature Request
Category Backend / Core
Status Closed
Assigned To No-one
Operating System All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version Devel
Due in Version 2.36
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 100%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

Currently we have individual tables for cameras, lenses, filters, films, scanners, supports, and flashes.

We need to support multiple flashes, filters, and supports per image.

flashes, filters, supports, and scanners are effectively identical. These could be combined first, and eventually we could allow multiples per image.
This task depends upon

Closed by  Solomon Peachy (pizza)
Sunday, 02 March 2008, 12:51 GMT-4
Reason for closing:  Implemented
Additional comments about closing:  camera/film will come later, but otherwise the worst is over.
Comment by Solomon Peachy (pizza) - Tuesday, 15 May 2007, 14:26 GMT-4
As the i18n effort progresses all of the strings are being unified so that the page code is nearly identical.

The backend stuff is different still, of course.
Comment by Solomon Peachy (pizza) - Saturday, 01 March 2008, 22:10 GMT-4
filters, flashes, supports, and scanners have been unified into a single table.

film, lenses, and cameras will follow.
Comment by Solomon Peachy (pizza) - Sunday, 02 March 2008, 10:24 GMT-4
filters, flashes, supports, scanners, and lenses are merged (r1950)

film and cameras may or may not follow.
Comment by Solomon Peachy (pizza) - Sunday, 02 March 2008, 12:50 GMT-4
film and cameras both have several extra fields that make things more difficult -- iso/filmsize and ICCProfile/IgnoreComment respectively.

I'll leave them out for the time being; we aren't going to have multiple film/cameras for a given image, after all.

Loading...